<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Library of Congress &#8211; Photos from 1939-1945</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitchgamer.net/2007/02/04/library-of-congress-photos-from-1939-1945/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitchgamer.net/2007/02/04/library-of-congress-photos-from-1939-1945/</link>
	<description>skill through rapidly pushing buttons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flickr and copyright of public domain works</title>
		<link>http://www.twitchgamer.net/2007/02/04/library-of-congress-photos-from-1939-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Flickr and copyright of public domain works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitchgamer.net/2007/02/04/library-of-congress-photos-from-1939-1945/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] This post over at House of Commons caught my eye because of its use of an image that appears to be something one would expect to be in the public domain, but is licensed under a Creative Commons licence.  It is just the type of image that one can find in the US Library of Congress archives or on a museum site &#8212; an old advertisement  poster from what looks like the early 1900&#8217;s or late 1800&#8217;s. The original of these images would be firmly in the public domain if it is an advertisement from this timeframe (in the US anyway). For more, see my earlier post on some pictures from the LOC that I found interesting. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post over at House of Commons caught my eye because of its use of an image that appears to be something one would expect to be in the public domain, but is licensed under a Creative Commons licence.  It is just the type of image that one can find in the US Library of Congress archives or on a museum site &#8212; an old advertisement  poster from what looks like the early 1900&#8217;s or late 1800&#8217;s. The original of these images would be firmly in the public domain if it is an advertisement from this timeframe (in the US anyway). For more, see my earlier post on some pictures from the LOC that I found interesting. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.311 seconds -->
